For your Final Project, you will apply the information you have learned in this course to critically analyze a specific case study from the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Workbook (The Louis de la P

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.essayjunction.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

For your Final Project, you will apply the information you have learned in this course to critically analyze a specific case study from the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Workbook (The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, 2002) and develop an assessment and intervention plan based on it. Your Final Project must include rationale based on learning resources and scholarly material. All work should be supported with scholarly references from the professional literature contained within the Lamar University Library.

For your Final Project, you will apply the information you have learned in this course to critically analyze a specific case study from the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Workbook (The Louis de la P
Rubric Detail   A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Content Top of Form Name: Substance Abuse Counseling Final Assignment Rubric Description: Substance Abuse Counseling Final Project Grading Criteria Grid View List View   Exemplary Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Accuracy of responses Question 1Overview of the Case Study (2 paragraphs)9 points Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides clear information about the case study (2 paragraphs). Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Provides a basic analysis of the case study (2 paragraphs). Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides minimal information about the case study Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Information about the case study is minimal, has errors, or is missing Accuracy of responses Question 2A description of procedures and process you would use for assessment and diagnosis in the selected case study. Be sure to include rationale for your selections (bullet points with rationale)9 points Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Clearly identifies 4-5 procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis f the counselor under consideration. All required elements are thoroughly addressed Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Identifies 2 -3 procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Identifies at least 1 procedure and process for assessment and diagnosis Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Minimally Identifies procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis Accuracy of responses Question 3Include an analysis of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the substances used in the case study (provide a chart that summarizes the information).15 points Points Range:13 (6.50%) – 15 (7.50%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a comprehensive examination of at least five pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles Points Range:12 (6.00%) – 12 (6.00%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Provides an examination of 3-5 pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles Points Range:10 (5.00%) – 11 (5.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides a minimal review of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 9 (4.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of responses Question 4Develop a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Include a rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs).20 points Points Range:18 (9.00%) – 20 (10.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Includes a clear rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs). Points Range:16 (8.00%) – 17 (8.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Includes minimal rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs). Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5 but it is missing some elements. Includes a rationale that doesn’t accurately differentiate between substance dependence and substance abuse Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (6.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. diagnosis based on the DSM-5 is inaccurate or missing. Rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse is inaccurate or missing Design and Mechanics Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%) No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors; APA style is accurate with no errors Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%) Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors (1-3); APA style is accurate with 1-3 errors Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%) Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors (4-10); APA style has numerous errors (4-10). Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%) Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors (more than 10); APA style is inaccurate more than 10 errors Accuracy of responses Question 5Analyze and discuss how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages)25 points Points Range:18 (9.00%) – 20 (10.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Clearly analyzes and discusses how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages) Points Range:16 (8.00%) – 17 (8.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a broad analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages) Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides a minimal analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (6.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction is missing or inaccurate. Accuracy of Responses Question 6Discuss the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages).20 points Points Range:18 (9.00%) – 20 (10.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages). Points Range:16 (8.00%) – 17 (8.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages). Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (6.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of Responses Question 7Discuss the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages).25 points Points Range:18 (9.00%) – 20 (10.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages). Points Range:16 (8.00%) – 17 (8.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages). Points Range:14 (7.00%) – 15 (7.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (6.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of Responses Question 8Analyze and apply the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (include a chart with short rationale).15 points Points Range:13 (6.50%) – 15 (7.50%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough Analysis of at least five main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale). Points Range:12 (6.00%) – 12 (6.00%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses 3-5 main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale). Points Range:10 (5.00%) – 11 (5.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale). Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 9 (4.50%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Analysis of the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of Responses Question 9Explain the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs).30 points Points Range:22 (11.00%) – 25 (12.50%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of at least 3 typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs). Points Range:20 (10.00%) – 21 (10.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses at least 3 typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs). Points Range:17 (8.50%) – 19 (9.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 16 (8.00%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of Responses Question 10Describe the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages).25 points Points Range:22 (11.00%) – 25 (12.50%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages). Points Range:20 (10.00%) – 21 (10.50%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages). Points Range:17 (8.50%) – 19 (9.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 18 (9.00%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts is inaccurate or missing. Accuracy of Responses Question 11Analyze and discuss any ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs).10 points Points Range:9 (4.50%) – 10 (5.00%) Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs). Points Range:8 (4.00%) – 8 (4.00%) Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs). Points Range:7 (3.50%) – 7 (3.50%) Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (3.00%) Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case is inaccurate or missing. Name:Substance Abuse Counseling Final Assignment Rubric Description:Substance Abuse Counseling Final Project Grading Criteria
For your Final Project, you will apply the information you have learned in this course to critically analyze a specific case study from the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Workbook (The Louis de la P
Running head: FINAL PAPER ` 0 Co-occurring disorders Treatment Tonya Hayes CNDV 5326_01 Lamar University Fall 2020 Co-occurring disorders Treatment Co-occurring disorders imply concurring substance use, whether used as dependence or abuse, and mental illness such as anxiety and depression. The diagnosis is what is referred to as a co-occurring disorder. Any blend concerning substance abuse and mental health disorders is categorized under this diagnosis, such as depression and alcohol addiction, heroin dependence, post-traumatic stress and dependence on prescription drugs, and anxiety. The connection between the two is that when one is involved in activities related to substance abuse such as the use of Marijuana, it leads to the development of mental health illnesses such as confusion, paranoia, and anxiety. Overview of the Case Study The act of Bennie resorting to indulge in the use of cocaine, in this case, is what which is referred to as substance use, is what lead to his mental health illness referred to as a depression. Bennie has been struggling with depression for two months, and as a result of Bennie losing his job at the construction company where he was working after his screening turned out positive for cocaine. Bennie losing his job caused him to be stressed, sad, and very depressed; the constant feeling of sadness and interest made him more depressed. It caused him to experience insomnia; even when he overdosed, he still woke up tired and exhausted and felt even more depressed. He lost interest in engaging in activities that could earn him money. The events continued to worsen, especially when his girlfriend left him after not being able to take it anymore. Instead of Bennie resorting to getting help by considering treatment or reaching out for help, he decides to now get into heavy drinking and taking in even more crack and cocaine. It worsens the situation as he even gets more depressed and even develops suicidal thoughts. The connection between depression and substance abuse is illustrated when he indulges in drugs to avoid sadness. Bennie could consider seeking medical attention, such as visiting a counselor offering a talk therapy. Similarly, he could also be put under medication, which involves using antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics to treat depression. The most appropriate action for Bennie to take was to visit a therapist to be offered a talk therapy by the counselor in a session where he willingly opens up to the counselor, and he is advised appropriately. Procedures and Process for Assessment and Diagnosis Depression ought to be evaluated as mild, severe, or moderate, considering the extent and the effect of symptoms and its extent. The assessment is very significant as it ascertains the type of treatment that will be used. The assessment involves; The inclusion of a complete history and assessment inclusive of the mental health status. Discovery of useful mutual and social issues. Noting down of psychiatric events that highlight past events of depression and mood changes, reaction to the past treatments, and contemporary mental illnesses exist. Examining the safety of the client and the possible risks he posses to others. Getting of third party details from family members or friends and its relevance Diagnosis Medication: Health experts might recommend the use of antidepressants which is vital for stabilizing their mood. Pro-active talking therapy sessions: This is involves talking to counselor or a health expert where one opens up about the problems they are facing and appropriate actions taken Electroconvulsive Therapy: It is suitable for clients suffering severe depression or other disorders related to bipolar which is not receptive to other forms of treatment. Combination of different treatment: This is significant to establish the right type of treatment that should be offered to a client, the most appropriate is selected. Help from different support groups: This is in cases where it is necessary to help come up with appropriate strategy in curbing the ailment. Support groups such as Cocaine Anonymous (CA), Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), or Narcotics Anonymous (NA). DSM-5 Diagnosis Bennie was suffering from severe depression; he had reached to the extent of putting an end to his life. DSM-5 is the most appropriate tool to be used in cases of complex and severe depression. Bennie meets the DSM-V criteria for Cocaine Use Disorder Severe (F14.20). It is undertaken when one engages in substance abuse at high levels persistently, when one wants to quit and fails to do so, and when one spends most of his time engaging with the drug (Mcfarlane, 2005). Bennie had been struggling with cocaine as he took it in large amounts and spent most of his time using drugs, which affected his mental health by great length as it became too severe since he faced constant depression. Bennie had felt a depressed mood, lack of sleep, and loss of interest in activities. To a large extent Bennie was deep into the use of substance abuse which greatly affected his mental health leading to severe depression. The treatment would involve medications such as the use of antidepressants in the treatment of depression as it would be significant in stabilizing the client’s mood. An individual might similarly visit a counselor to get therapy talks that will enable them to open up and get their problems solved. Ethical Issues Inherent in the Case Study When Bennie started to engage into heavy smoking and use of cocaine to take care of the stress he was going through, he lacked individual responsibility. This is mainly because he did not make appropriate decisions that could have helped him in overcoming the depression he was going through. He ended up feeling more depressed to the point of losing himself and developed suicidal thoughts. Bennie could have taken the right decision by keeping his mood relaxed and seek help from friends and health professionals. Bennie involved himself in the use of cocaine which is an illegal drug. Cocaine is an illegal drug which is prohibited for use by individuals, the buying and selling of Cocaine is forbidden. Anyone found in possession or to be using cocaine, strict actions are taken against them by the law enforcers. Cocaine is a very dangerous drug that destroys the lives of many individuals as it is highly addictive. Individuals spend most of their time and money on it. References Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. Danto, A., & Pruzansky, M. (2011). 1001 pediatric treatment activities: Creative ideas for therapy sessions. Thorofare, NJ: Slack. Ekleberry, S. C. (2011). Integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders: Personality disorders and addiction. Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders: Personality Disorders and Addiction. 1-232. doi:10.4324/9780203843710 Mcfarlane, A. C. (2005). Psychiatric Morbidity Following Disasters: Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors. Disasters and Mental Health, 37-63. doi:10.1002/047002125x.ch3

Writerbay.net

We offer the best essay writing services to students who value great quality at a fair price. Let us exceed your expectations if you need help with this or a different assignment. Get your paper completed by a writing expert today. Nice to meet you! Want 15% OFF your first order? Use Promo Code: FIRST15. Place your order in a few easy steps. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper