Need an research paper on pros and cons of continuing space exploration. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Need an research paper on pros and cons of continuing space exploration. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism. In this research paper, we try to analyze both sides of the argument and conclude why the US government should work to dilate NASA programs’ funding and what should be the role of the NASA administration in this regard.

&nbsp.

NASA AND ITS PROJECT HISTORY

&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp. In the period starting from 1958 till 2008, the total spending on NASA has been 471.23 billion dollars, which makes an average of $9.06 billion per year. NASA’s budget for FY 2008 sums up to $17.318 billion, which is almost 0.6% of the $2.9 trillion United States federal budget for the year. Nearly about 35% of total academic scientific research spending in the United States. These figures might look huge, but the point of consideration is that they have enabled NASA to provide humanity with some emphatic developments and research successes. NASA’s most prominent discoveries and products are the Pioneer 10, Voyager 1 and 2, Hubble Telescope, Space Shuttle Program, Apollo 13, Mars Pathfinder, and Moon Landing. These benchmarks have proved that the funding provided to the agency was fully utilized for productive purposes. These days there is a contention about whether NASA would be able to carry out its latest Constellation Program to retiring the space shuttle this year, replacing it Orion (capsule-based vehicles), and lunar landers and Space Launch System, etc.

&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp. But all these prospects rest on the simple debate that whether the amount being spent in this area is worth it, especially when American debt is making life more challenging for the Finance Ministry day in and day out.

&nbsp.

THE DARK SIDE OF NASA OPERATIONS:

&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp. It is a known fact that most of NASA’s projects face massive research flaws and take a lot of effort and financial input to rectify those flaws. For example, the Space Launch System that is currently being worked on has a billion dollars. Still, massive security and sustainability issues are popping up that place doubts in the government’s minds as to whether the mission would remain viable or not. Another significant loss incurred by NASA was the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter in 1999, in which $327.6 million was invested for the orbiter and Lander and $193.1 million was invested for spacecraft development. Also, $91.7 million and $42.8 million were incurred to launch the mission and operate the activities, respectively.