The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Visit the Bureau’s web site at the link provided below. Spend ti

Get perfect grades by consistently using www.essayjunction.com. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Visit the Bureau’s web site at the link provided below. Spend time reviewing videos, news reports and resources and provide a thoughtful opinion of whether or not the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will be a valuable addition in regards to providing additional protection to consumers, especially in regards to subprime lending and alternative mortgage loans.

http://www.consumerfinance.gov/

discussion for response/comment (50 words)

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Subprime lending is borrowing money when the borrower had either no credit history or a low credit score. Interest rates for subprime lending are higher because the way it’s seen by the lender, they’re taking a risk with someone who they don’t believe to be ideal borrowers.

I think the CFPB will be valuable in providing protection to consumers because they offer tips such as being careful in accepting a subprime loan because it doesn’t mean you aren’t qualified for prime lending, which has lower interest rates.

There are several options for alternative mortgage loans. The options are listed under their “Understand loan options” page. I found that there was a fairly easy way to get to this page, and they even break up the process by offering breakdowns of loan terms, interest rate types and loan type. I like the organization of the information and believe that because it is so well organized, that this would make for an excellent resource for consumers to not only have but to be able to truly understand. Each subcategory is organized by title, definition, option comparisons, and a “What to Know” section. I would highly recommend this website for consumer’s knowledge.

The way I see it, this website is ideal for consumer education, specifically for mortgage types and options. As far as protection, I would say it would be a good start. If the consumer were to use this resource correctly, I would find it essential to seek education before buying a home. Aside from consumer education, the “Contact Us” page offers phone numbers, mailing address and headquarter addresses. They extend their services by offering their resource to filing a complaint, assuring that they would point you in the right direction.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Visit the Bureau’s web site at the link provided below. Spend ti
MANAGEMENT FOCUS Protecting U.S. Magnesium In February 2004, U.S. Magnesium, the sole surviving U.S. producer of magnesium, a metal that is primarily used in the manufacture of certain automobile parts and aluminium can, filed a petition with U.S. International Trade Commission contending that a surge in imports had caused material damage to the U.S. industry’s employment sales, market share, and profitability. According to U.S. Magnesium, Russian and Chinese producers had been selling the metal at prices significantly below market value. During 2002 and 2003, imports of magnesium into the United States rose 70 percent, while prices fell by 40 percent, and the market share accounted for by imports jumped to 50 percent from 25 percent. “The United States used to be the largest producer of magnesium in the world” a U.S. Magnesium spokesperson said at the time of the filing. “What’s really sad is that you can be state of the art and have modern technology, and if the Chinse, who pay people less than 90 cents an hour, want to run you out of business, they can do it. And that’s why we are seeking relief”. During a yearlong investigation, the ITC solicited input from various sides in the dispute. Foreign produces and consumers of magnesium in the United States argued that falling prices for magnesium during 2002 and 2003 simply reflected an imbalance between supply and demand due to additional capacity coming on stream not from Russia or China but from a new Canadian plant that opened in 2001 and from a planned Australian plant. The Canadian plant shut down in 2003, the Australian plant never came on stream, and prices for magnesium rose again 2004. Magnesium consumers in the United States also argued to the ITC that imposing antidumping duties on foreign imports of magnesium would raise prices in the United States significantly above world levels. A spokesperson for Alcoa, which mixes magnesium with aluminium to make alloys for can, predicted that if antidumping duties were imposed, high magnesium prices in the United Stated would force Alcoa to move some production out of the United States. Alcoa also noted that in 2003, U.S. Magnesium was unable to supply all of Alcoa’s needs, forcing the company to turn to imports. Consumers of magnesium in the automobile industry asserted that high prices in the United States would drive engineers to design magnesium out of automobiles or force manufacturing elsewhere, which would ultimately hurt everyone. The six members of the ITC were not convinced by these arguments. In March 2005, the ITC ruled that both China and Russia had been dumping magnesium in the United States. The government decided to impose duties ranging from 50 percent to more than 140 percent on imports of magnesium from China. Russian producers faced duties ranging from 19 percent to 22 percent. The duties were to be levied for five years, after which the ITC would revisit the situation. The ITC revoked the antidumping order on Russia in February 2011 but decided to continue placing them on Chinese produces. They were finally removed by the ITC in 2014. According to U.S. Magnesium, the initial favourable ruling allowed the company to reap the benefits of nearly $50 million in investments made in its manufacturing plant and enabled the company to boost its capacity by 28 percent by the end of 2005. Commenting on the favourable ruling, a U.S. Magnesium spokesperson noted, “Once unfair trade is removed from the marketplace we’ll be able to compete with anyone”. U.S. Magnesium’s customers and competitors, however, did not view the situation as one of unfair trade. While the imposition of antidumping duties no doubt helped to protect U.S. Magnesium and the 400 people it employed from foreign competition, magnesium consumers in the United States felt they were the ultimate losers, a view that seemed to be confirmed by price data. In early 2010 the price for magnesium alloy in the United States was $2.30 per pound, compared to $1.54 in Mexico, $1.49 in Europe, and $1.36 in China.

Writerbay.net

We offer the best essay writing services to students who value great quality at a fair price. Let us exceed your expectations if you need help with this or a different assignment. Get your paper completed by a writing expert today. Nice to meet you! Want 15% OFF your first order? Use Promo Code: FIRST15. Place your order in a few easy steps. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper